Legal Opinion

Barton v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 18, 2023No. 3:22-cv-08022Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Manley Barton, et al., ) No. CV-22-08022-PCT-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian ) 12 Relocation, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) and 16 Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19). Both Motions have been 17 fully briefed.1 For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion will be denied and 18 Defendant’s Cross-Motion will be granted.2 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 A. The Settlement Act 21 The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. The Hopi Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Navajo Tribe, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API