Barton v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Manley Barton, et al., ) No. CV-22-08022-PCT-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian ) 12 Relocation, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) and 16 Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19). Both Motions have been 17 fully briefed.1 For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion will be denied and 18 Defendant’s Cross-Motion will be granted.2 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 A. The Settlement Act 21 The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- The Hopi Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Navajo Tribe, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.