Legal Opinion

Wiltz v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1975No. Docket 19690PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. F. Cavanagh, J.

This appeal arises from the disposition of the proceeds of a contract of insurance on the life of Percy Paulfry Wiltz, now deceased. Mr. Wiltz was originally married to the cross-defendant-appellee Annette Wiltz. The couple had five children. In 1969, Mr. Wiltz, an employee of Ford Motor Company, designated on his group life insurance application that his wife at that time, Annette Wiltz, was to be the recipient of any death benefits under the policy. The insurer on this policy was John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereafter "John Hancock”).

On April 11, 1969, Annette and Percy Wiltz…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. White v. Michigan Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Binben v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Moore v. McDowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. City of Warren v. Mac-Way Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Gleed v. NoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Lonergan v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Dubois v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Bell v. BellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API