Legal Opinion

Steiner Et Vir v. City of Pgh.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1986No. Appeal, 85 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

Anna and David Steiner, husband and wife, and their minor children, Michael and Douglas Steiner (appellants) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which granted the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by the City of Pittsburgh (appellee) and dismissed their Amended Complaint as barred by the “Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act” (Code).

In the procedural posture of this case, we are confronted not with the merits, as such, but solely with the issue of whether the allegations in appellants’ Amended Complaint were sufficient to warrant a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. MELENDEZ BY MELENDEZ v. City of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Morris v. MusserCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Beardell v. Western Wayne School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Buskirk v. SeipleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. King Et Vir v. BreachCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. City of Philadelphia v. GlimCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Cooper v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Lara, Inc. v. Dorney Park Coaster Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Miller v. EmelsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API