St. Amand v. Petro Sales, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The plaintiffs, a driver and his collision insurer, appeal from the dismissal of their tort suit. The chief issue is whether the trial court committed manifest error in holding that the plaintiff driver was con-tributorily negligent because of excessive speed.
The suit arises from an accident occurring after dark at 9:00 P.M. on July 30, 1962. It took place in the open country On Louisiana Highway 10, a principal state route between Opelousas and Alexandria.
Immediately prior to the accident, the plaintiff St. Amand was driving south towards Opelousas. At that time, a large…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Steele Ex Rel. Steele v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Suire v. WintersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Demerest v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Deshotels v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.