Legal Opinion

In re David M.

New York City Family Court

Decided October 1, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

M. Holt Meyer, J.

In this delinquency proceeding respondent was charged with having committed acts which, if he were an adult, would constitute the following crimes: (1) Penal Law § 155.35, grand larceny in the second degree, (2) Penal Law § 165.50, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, (3) Penal Law § 165.06, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and (4) Penal Law § 145.00, criminal mischief in the fourth degree. At the initial appearance, respondent’s counsel made a motion for a dismissal of the third count. This motion was orally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re John N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re David P.New York City Family Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API