Legal Opinion

Islar v. Farrar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs Kathy Islar and Charles Gonzales appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated July 7, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Pauline Farrar and Matthew Farrar which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

These actions arise out of a three-car accident on July 15, 1994, at the intersection of Avenue T and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Velez v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Wright v. MorozinisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Rodriguez v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Florio v. BaierleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lapadula v. Sang Shing KwokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Merchant v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API