Legal Opinion

United States v. Luguis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 12, 2001No. 99 CR. 278(LMM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McKENNA, District Judge.

Defendant Samuel Luguis has filed a pretrial motion seeking (1) dismissal of the indictment because the facts proffered by the government are insufficient to support a finding that defendant’s conduct obstructed, delayed or affected interstate commerce as required under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; (2) dismissal of the indictment because of prejudicial pre-in-dictment delay; (3) suppression of the identification testimony or in the alternative a hearing to determine its admissibility; and (4) discovery pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 16. For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MoranDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
  2. United States v. ScalaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API