United States v. Luguis
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McKENNA, District Judge.
Defendant Samuel Luguis has filed a pretrial motion seeking (1) dismissal of the indictment because the facts proffered by the government are insufficient to support a finding that defendant’s conduct obstructed, delayed or affected interstate commerce as required under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; (2) dismissal of the indictment because of prejudicial pre-in-dictment delay; (3) suppression of the identification testimony or in the alternative a hearing to determine its admissibility; and (4) discovery pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 16. For the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MoranDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. ScalaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015