McGee v. State

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Christopher McGee seeks to overturn his conviction of aggravated sexual assault of a child by contending that 1) the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge, 2) the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress his written statement, and 3) the evidence is legally insufficient. We affirm the judgment.

Background

Appellant was charged with penetrating the sexual organ of his girlfriend’s five-year-old daughter with his finger. The victim did not testify, and the primary source of evidence against him came from his written admission to…