Legal Opinion

Salomon v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 15, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The merchandise under consideration in this case consists of 340 bags of finely ground silica. Duty was assessed thereon at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 214, Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is dutiable under paragraph 207 as silica, crude, at $3.50 per ton, or as an earth unwrought or unmanufactured at $1 per ton, or as an earth wrought or manufactured at $2 per ton. By amendment, it is further claimed that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1775, providing for silica eo nomine.

*294The pertinent provisions of the Tariff Act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crimmins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Nissho Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Protest 992190-G of L. A. Salomon & Bro.United States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API