Legal Opinion

Purifoy v. Griffen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 16, 2015No. CR-14-1008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2015 Ark. 171

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-14-1008 IVORY PURIFOY Opinion Delivered April 16, 2015 PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. MANDAMUS [PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NOS. 60CR-96-871, 60CR-96-1346] HON. WENDELL LEE GRIFFEN, JUDGE RESPONDENT PETITION DENIED IN PART AND MOOT IN PART. PER CURIAM This court requested an amended response from the respondent in this matter, the Honorable Wendell Lee Griffen. Petitioner Ivory Purifoy filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court alleging that Judge Griffen had failed to act in a timely manner on a pro se petition for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standridge v. PutmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Purifoy v. GriffenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API