Legal Opinion

Russell v. Randall

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Brie county. Action by Bobert P. Bussell against Nelson Bandall. Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The motion upon which the order was made was treated by the learned judge at special term as a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence; and such it was, to all intents and purposes; *328but it was heard without a case to show what evidence was given on the trial already had. In the opinion at special term, it is said: “It is not cumulative evidence which is proposed to be added to the case, as that has been described by the authorities, but the proposal is to prove distinct and independent matters, in no manner brought before to the attention of the court and jury.” The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bantheon v. MeierNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  3. Katz v. AtfieldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1891
  4. Russell v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API