Helme v. Buckelew
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Mary E. Buokelew, as executrix, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of August, 1919, denying defendant’s motion to set aside the service of the summons.
1Dissent
Laughlin, J. (dissenting) :
A copy of the summons was delivered to the defendant in the county and State of New York on the 17th of July, 1919. The title of the action shows that it was brought against the party served not individually but as executrix of the last will and testament of Frederick L. Buckelew and there was indorsed on the summons a notice to the effect that upon default in *69appearing or answering it judgment would be taken against the defendant for $25,000, with interest thereon from the 20th of November, 1912, and for costs of the action. On the 6th of August, 1919, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hopper v. . HopperNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.