Legal Opinion

Battles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1927No. 10972Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant insists that the judgment should be reversed on account of the insufficiency of the evidence. The other questions presented in the motion have been considered and will not again be discussed. The judgment was originally reversed on confession of error predicated on the mistaken idea that the court gave no charge on circumstantial evidence. No charge on this subject was embraced in the main charge, but was contained in a supplementary instruction. This was called to our attention in the state’s motion for rehearing. That point and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albaneso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API