Legal Opinion

Warner v. Carimi Law Firm

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1998No. 97-CA-1259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 WICKER, Judge.

This case is a dispute between attorneys regarding division of client fees and • costs under "a contract between the attorneys. The matter was previously before us on appeal of the granting of a partial summary judgment, which we reversed and remanded because it was not ripe for summary judgment. Warner v. Carimi, 96-55 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), 678 So.2d 561. It now comes before us on appeal of three judgments, consisting of two partial summary judgments and a third judgment granting an exception of prescription (which the trial court treated as a partial exception of cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner v. Carimi Law FirmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Audubon Trace Condominium Ass'n v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warner v. Carimi Law FirmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Chittenden v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API