Legal Opinion

Roxbury v. Willey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1976No. 7065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The issue in this petition for partition is whether there was evidence to support the award of $13,000 for the fair value of improvements made on the common property by the defendants. We hold there was not.

Defendants Willey for two years prior to 1961 had occupied one *28of three buildings on the property in question as tenants of Olive E. Roxbury who in fact had only a one-third interest in the entire premises. In 1961 defendants paid $4,000 to Olive and obtained a warranty deed for the entire property which had frontage on the shore of Pleasant Lake. Thereafter, believing that they owned the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner v. EatonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  2. Wendell v. MoultonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1852

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poisson v. PoissonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API