Legal Opinion

Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph Gerace, J.), entered November 13, 2002. The order denied the motions and cross motions of defendants Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy and Drake, Architects and Landscape Architects, PC. (Habiterra Associates), Atomized Materials Co., Inc., Color Technics Co., Inc., DAI] Inc., Henderson-Johnson, Inc., Hercules Incorporated, Nichter Construction Co., Inc., and Aramark/The Service Master *1081Company to dismiss the amended complaints against them, granted plaintiffs’ cross motion to extend the time to file proof of service against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API