Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Styron

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1967No. 112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant agree that the plaintiff stored his boat with the defendant, and that the defendant was to keep it tied up, pump the rain water out of it, and generally to protect it during the winter. This arrangement created the relation of bailor and bailee between plaintiff and defendant. Nothing else appearing, the contract did not constitute defendant an insurer of the safety of plaintiff’s boat. The relationship merely imposed upon defendant the duty to exercise ordinary care to protect plaintiff’s boat against loss, damage, or destruction, and to return it in as good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Universal Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. M. B. Haynes Electric Corp. v. Justice Aero Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Flexlon Fabrics, Inc. v. Wicker Pick-Up & Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Cross Country Leasing Corp. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969
  5. Nilsen v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API