Legal Opinion

People v. Long Island Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In these cases, indictments had been found against the defendants, in the county of Kings, for a public nuisance, and the indictments having been removed into the Supreme Court, the defendants moved, on affidavits, for a change of the place of trial. The facts and circumstances sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

*603 By the Court,

S. B. Strong, J.

The defendants have moved that the place of trial in these actions should be changed, on the ground that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county of Kings, where the indictments were found, and the facts upon which they are-based occurred.

There are reasons for which I would gladly have abstained from expressing an opinion upon the motion, but they are not such as to legally disqualify or exonerate me from participating in the decision, and as -my views differ to some extent from those expressed -by one of my brethren, I conceive that I am bound to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Judson v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. . McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. LucasNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Taylor v. GardinerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API