Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Pence

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1891No. 67PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhakd, J.

The appellant was the general contractor for the construction of a drain in Marion county, which had been established by order of the circuit court of that county, and awarded to James F. Flack, commissioner of drainage.

The appellee was a sub-contractor, under the appellant, to do the excavating. As such sub-contractor he entered into a written contract with the appellant for the performance of the work, and that contract forms the foundation of this action.

The only error assigned here is that the court in general term erred in affirming the judgment of the court in special term.

The errors…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Pickens v. BozellIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Morton v. KaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Keller v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Romel v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Deep Vein Coal Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Albee Hammond Homes, Inc. v. BickneseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API