Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Coveney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding to compel the respondent board of elections to place the name of petitioner Doyle on the separate Taxpayers Against Crime Party row, the names of petitioners Pendzick, Doroski, Ziemacki and Lombardi on the separate Better Riverhead Party row, and the names of petitioners Murphy, Grigonis, Kujawski, Bednoski and Krupski on the separate South-hold Preservation Coalition row of the ballot as candidates in the general election to be held on November 8,1983 for various public offices in the County of Suffolk, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Button v. DonohueNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Battista v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. General Cherry v. HaydukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Kiley v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Kiley v. CoveneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaValle v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Pocchia v. DeFrancescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API