Legal Opinion

Caruth v. Sparkman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1933No. 8 Div. 492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDDIN, Justice.

The action was for damages for injuries to person and property growing out of the collision of defendant’s truck with the'plaintiff’s wagon on a public highway.

The vehicles, each driven by the owner, were going in the same direction on a paved highway; and the collision occurred as the truck was passing the wagon.

Count 2 of the complaint charged that defendant “so willfully or wantonly managed or operated said truck as to cause the same, as a proximate consequence of such willfulness or wautonness, to run into and collide with said wagon in which plaintiff was riding.”

This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. J. C. Byram & Co. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. GoochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. J. C. Byram &. Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Francis v. Imperial Sanitary Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Jack Cole, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Claude Jones & Son v. LairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Daniel v. MotesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API