Legal Opinion
PINTADO v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 14, 2007No. 3D06-561PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
970 So.2d 857 (2007)
Raul PINTADO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-561.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 14, 2007.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gwendolyn Powell Braswell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Lucretia A. Pitts, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
The defendant appeals the order revoking his probation. We affirm.
The defendant contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by excluding defense witnesses whom…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Gurganus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Grace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mohler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- West v. Secretary Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024