Legal Opinion

Kam v. Blank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 22, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The court erred in determining as a matter of law that the general release delivered to John I. Phlegar, Jr., discharged the defendant, a cotort-feasor. The general release effected a settlement of the action in New Jersey. Under the circumstances, the law of New Jersey should have been applied in a determination of the effect of the general release upon the liability of a cotort-feasor. The burden of proof is upon the defendant to sustain his contention that a general release under the law of New Jersey releases a cotort-feasor.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed, with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garlock v. New York Tree Savers, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API