Bombard v. Girard
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The writ and complaint dated October 9, 1968, alleged that while the plaintiff was operating his automobile in Hartford on or about December 22, 1967, it was negligently struck and damaged by a motor vehicle owned and operated by the defendant. The plaintiff claimed damages only for his vehicle. Subsequently, on February 6, 1969, the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, by adding a claim for damages for personal injuries as well, was granted, and he filed an amendment to his complaint. To the complaint as amended, the defendant filed a motion that the plaintiff be required to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Radezky v. Sargent & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Hitchcock v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Bulkley v. Norwich & Westerly Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- O'Connor v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981