Legal Opinion
Gulrajaney v. Petricha
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 14, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
885 A.2d 496 (2005)
381 N.J. Super. 241
Chandur GULRAJANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Stacey PETRICHA, Barbara Tokay, Pooja Dhawan, Pat Dhawan and Gina Riggi, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 2005.
Decided November 14, 2005.
Robert E. Margulies, Jersey City, argued the cause for appellant (Margulies, Wind & Herrington, attorneys; Frank E. Catalina, Peekskill, NY, on the brief).
Corinne M. Mullen argued the cause for respondent Stacey Petricha.
Cathy C. Cardillo argued the cause for respondents Barbara Tokay and Gina Riggi.
Stanley R. Bright…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agar v. JudyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
- McIntyre v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nuwave Investment Corp. v. Hyman Beck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- YANG v. PEONY LINDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022