Mazzaro v. Paull
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.
The plaintiffs, wife and husband, appeal from jury verdicts for the defendant physician on claims for injuries to the wife and consequential damages to the husband resulting from the physician’s alleged negligence in the performance of a hysterectomy operation. The appeal was entered in the Appeals Court, and we transferred the case here. G. L. c. 211A, § 10 (A).
The sole issue presented is the validity of the trial judge’s exclusion from evidence of a copy of the Directory of Medical Specialists (directory), also known as Marquis Who’s Who, Inc., which the plaintiffs sought to introduce to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Jordan v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Torre v. Harris-Seybold Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Fall River Savings Bank v. CallahanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Rice v. James Hanrahan & SonsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.