Rushing v. Rushing

I agree that the challenged order is not “final” and, thus, we lack jurisdiction to *924review the order at this time. That said, because of the additional delays and expense that resulted from this court’s denial of Appellee’s February 2012 motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, I would have been inclined to exercise our discretion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(i) to permit the trial court to render a final order if review of the challenged order were governed by rule 9.110.1 However, review of the challenged order is governed by rule 9.130(a)(4), not rule…