Legal Opinion
Freely v. Shanahan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 24, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-0286Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOANN FREELY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-286 (CKK) PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 24, 2019) The Court has received Plaintiff’s [12] Motion to Vacate Dismissal Nunc Pro Tunc and Reopen Case [sic], as well as an updated version docketed at ECF No. 13 (“Pl.’s Mot.”). Taken collectively, these filings represent Plaintiff’s third attempt to reopen a case that the Court has dismissed without prejudice. The Court expressly incorporates by reference its Order of May 22, 2019, which sets forth why the Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Brandon Thrasher v. Amarillo Police DeptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.