Wiley v. Travelers Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBarnes, Justice
I cannot concur in the majority opinion.
The correctness of the trial court’s judgment and the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming it hinges upon the interpretation of the following portion of the insurance policy involved:
“Section II of this Policy does not apply:
“(d) to bodily injury or property damage arising out of business pursuits of an Insured except activities therein which are ordinarily incident to non-business pursuits; * *
The majority opinion reverses both of the previous judicial determinations in this case without considering the definitions contained in the policy itself.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conner v. Transamerica Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Home Insurance v. AurigemmaNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MacDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. HymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Continental Casualty Company v. BeatySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.