Legal Opinion
Plugmay Ltd. v. National Dynamics Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 12, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMilton Shalleck, J.
Plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendant by default on September 14, 1964, in Great Britain. It was granted by the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division. The present action is to recover the amount of said judgment.
Defendant’s answer sets up: (1) that the English court lacked jurisdiction over defendant, and (2) a denial of the allegations now of the substance of the English court statement of claim.
On the assertion that there is no triable issue of fact, plaintiff moves for summary judgment (CPLR 3211, subd. [b]; CPLR 3212), contending that there is no defense to the present…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith v. Prometco (Prod. & Metals)District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Bank of Montreal v. KoughDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- New Central Jute Mills Co. v. City Trade & Industries, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1971