Legal Opinion

Jeantilus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 2003No. 4D03-85PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

853 So.2d 1099 (2003)

Francis JEANTILUS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D03-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 13, 2003.

Rehearing Denied September 26, 2003.

Francis Jeantilus, Arcadia, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

FARMER, C.J.

In his motion for post conviction relief under rule 3.850, defendant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective. He alleges eighteen grounds of ineffectiveness, but we conclude that only one is not conclusively refuted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Almeida v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Simon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  4. Wittemen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Jeantilus v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API