Legal Opinion

Lopez-Sanchez v. Vergara-Agostini

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided February 24, 2006No. CIV.03-1073 SEC JAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on renewed motion under Rule 50, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for judgment as a matter of law; under Rule 59 for new trial, or in the alternative, to amend judgment filed by co-defendants Eduardo Ver-gara-Agostini (hereinafter “Vergara”) and Alicia Diaz (hereinafter “Diaz”) (collectively “defendants”) on December 23, 2005. (Docket No. 90.) Plaintiff filed her opposition to all the motions on January 18, 2006. (Docket No. 98.) After considering the evidence in the record, the applicable law and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Radamés Tejada v. FloresDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API