Veasey v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The appellant was tried and convicted of rape in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1803 (Repl. 1977) and received a thirty-five year sentence. Jurisdiction is in the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule 29 (1) (b). This appeal follows the denial of a motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court.
The facts relating to the motion for a new trial establish that appellant’s attorney stated by affidavit that two days after the trial he was in the corridor of the courthouse when Virgil Elmore, one of the jurors, approached him and said that the jury had assumed the appellant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Sanson v. PullumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Ashby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Tosh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hatley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Waterfield v. QuimbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- State v. OsbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.