Legal Opinion

MacK v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2000No. 49A02-9912-CR-808PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge

Derrick Mack challenges his conviction after a jury trial of dealing in cocaine, 1 a Class A felony, and possession of cocaine, 2 a Class D felony. Although Mack raises three issues, we find one dis-positive: whether the State’s witness’ comment that he identified Mack out of a group of people known to deal drugs in the area where Mack was arrested subjected Mack to grave peril. 3

Reversed and remanded.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Detective Peter Perkins of the Indianapolis Police Department worked an undercover narcotics investigation on August 4, 1997, targeting the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. James v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schlomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brooks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Pavey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Emerson Wade Bixler v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Luther Riddell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Mark Alan Shock v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API