Legal Opinion

Drake v. Wimbourne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1959No. 966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Judge.

The appellants, Marie Drake and James D. Camp, Jr., guardian ad litem for Marie Drake, filed this interlocutory appeal by reason of the entry of an order of the trial court denying Marie Drake’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff below filed a complaint sounding in tort, and on that complaint a summons to two defendants, Edward J. Poor and Marie Drake, was delivered to the sheriff. The sheriff’s return showed that the deputy had delivered a copy to the defendant, Marie Drake. The original complaint contained no allegations concerning the mental competency of Marie Drake. A motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zaro v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Davie v. Calton ex rel. CaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Jones ex rel. Jones v. LucksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API