Legal Opinion

Burch v. Perini

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1981No. 80-1339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A writ of habeas corpus is an extraordinary writ which is customarily granted with caution when an individual has no adequate remedy at law. The purpose of this writ is to determine the legality of the restraint or custody under which a person is held. Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, certiorari denied 382 U. S. 1017; In re Lockhart (1952), 157 Ohio St. 192. See, generally, Roden v. Hubbard (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 37; Liberatore v. McKeen (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 175; Linger v. Weiss (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 97, certiorari denied 444 U. S. 862.

The center of gravity of petitioner’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freeman v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Coleman v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Linger v. WeissOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Liberatore v. McKeenOhio Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StickrathOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Smith v. SheldonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Gibson v. BradshawOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API