Legal Opinion

Jevarien Zymell Dunlap v. Samaritan House

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-09086Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEVARIEN ZYMELL DUNLAP, Case No. 25-cv-09086-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 9 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 10 SAMARITAN HOUSE, COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION AND IFP APPLICATION 14 Plaintiff Jevarien Dunlap, pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). See ECF 15 No. 2. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. 16 The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Dunlap’s Complaint against Defendant M…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API