Legal Opinion
The Marianne
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided October 10, 1938No. Nos. 10, 11, 17, 18, 228PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, District Judge.
These six admiralty suits all relate to the stranding of the steamer Marianne; they were consolidated and tried together and accordingly may be disposed of in one opinion. In Docket Nos. 10 and 18 the cargo interests are seeking to recover for the physical damage to cargo caused by contact with sea water which entered the vessel. In Docket Nos. 11, 17 and 228 the cargo interests are seeking to recover the payments which they made to satisfy the salvor’s liens on the respective shipments of cargo. The sixth action, a. cross-libel, was filed by the master of the Marianne…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- Marx v. Natl. Steam-ship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goya Foods, Inc. v. S.S. ItalicaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Atlantic Towing Co. v. The CalicheDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
- Powell v. Global Marine, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009