Legal Opinion

Hansen v. ASDSSV ENDBORG

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 9, 1957Published

1Opinion of the Court

155 F.Supp. 387 (1957)

Erling Preben HANSEN, Plaintiff,

v.

A.S.D. S.S. V. ENDBORG and D.S. af A.S., Moller Steamship Co., Inc., and Robert C. Herd Co., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 9, 1957.

Jacob Rassner, New York City, Harvey Goldstein, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, Roland C. Radice, Vernon S. Jones, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.

The action is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Kathleen Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API