Legal Opinion
Wilmer Dixon, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. D. H. Holmes Company, Limited
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1978No. 77-1379PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district judge from the bench in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. See attached appendix.
AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX
THE COURT:
Motion for summary judgment on behalf of D. H. Holmes is granted. I see no reason to do more than render oral reasons, and I’ll give them at this time. .
The Truth in Lending Act requires truth in lending, but it’s not an act that requires sacrament in language. It does not require the use of shibboleths or other sacred terms.
It seems to be that the disclosure statement in this case, while, obviously, one could…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Richard L. Smith and Deborah L. Smith v. No. 2 Galesburg Crown Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Semar v. Platte Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Bryson v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.