People v. Bailey

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from his convictions for, inter alia, intentional and felony murder, defendant claims that the suppression court erred in not suppressing his oral and written confessions made to police officers. The suppression court found that defendant was not in custody *952when he made oral admissions without the benefit of Miranda warnings (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436). The resolution of factual issues by the suppression court should be honored unless unsupported as a matter of…