Legal Opinion

Cahalan v. Van Sant

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 2, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Allamakee District Court. — Hon. W. A. Hoyt, Judge. Action to redeem from a tax sale. There was a ■decree for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

— On the fifth day of January, 1887, ;the defendant firm received from the treasurer of Alla-makee county a tax deed for the north half of lot 5, in ¡section 10, township 96, range 3 north, in pursuance oí a sale thereof made in November, 1879, for the *595delinquent tax of 1878. No notice of the expiration, of redemption was given, as required by Code, section 894. The plaintiff, as owner óf the lot, has tendered the money for redemption, which was refused, and he brings this action, asking that a right of redemption be ■decreed. The title upon which the plaintiff bases his right of redemption…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. Low, Adams & FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Hall v. GuthridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Young v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jamison v. KnosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Shelley v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Thompson v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Burks v. HedingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Mehlhop v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API