Legal Opinion

Knox v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 2008No. 30 Sept.Term, 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this criminal case, we must interpret the language of Maryland Rule 4-215, Waiver of Counsel, and the meaning of the requirement of the Rule that the court shall “advise the defendant of the nature of the charges in the charging document, and the allowable penalties, including mandatory penalties, if any.” The question in this case is whether the mandatory penalties for a subsequent offender fall within the requirement of the Rule. We shall hold that they do and that such notice is required before a court may find that a defendant waives the right to be represented by counsel.

I

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Valonis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Brye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API