Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1984No. Civ. 21825Published

1Opinion of the Court

160 Cal.App.3d 768 (1984)

206 Cal. Rptr. 910

DAVID SCHULTZ, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. 21825.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

October 3, 1984.

COUNSEL

Donald L. Reidhaar, Christine Helwick and Edward M. Opton, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard and Thomas C. Hughes III for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SIMS, J.

In this case we hold, among other things, that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment requiring defendant Regents of the University of…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API