Legal Opinion
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 1, 2015No. Civil No. 09-319 ADM/SERPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge for a ruling on Defendant Octane Fitness, LLC’s (“Octane”) Application for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Expenses [Docket No. 286] (“Application”). Plaintiff Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. (“Icon”) has filed a Response [Docket No. 292] objecting to the Application. For the reasons set forth below, Octane’s Application is granted in part and denied in part.
II. BACKGROUND1
On July 1, 2015, the Court granted Octane’s renewed motion for attorney’s fees and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Bywaters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.