Legal Opinion

McClellan v. French

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1969No. 5-4776PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Don H. Me Cien - lan appeals from a jury verdict finding that appellee Dr. James H. French was not guilty of malpractice in his treatment of McClellan’s perirectal wound. For reversal of the judgment, McClellan relies upon the following points:

1. The Court erred in permitting Dr. Buchman to give his opinion as to whether Dr. French was guilty of malpractice.

2. The Court erred in permitting defendant to propound hypothetical questions based on assumed facts which were not in evidence.

The record shows that McClellan suffered his perirectal wound at Lake Ouachita…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Sneed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Hoener v. KochIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Dorr, Gray & Johnston v. HeadstreamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Wheeler, Adm'x v. Delco BenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jo Pearl Jeanes, Administratrix of the Estate of Tommy Joe Jeanes, Deceased v. E. L. Milner, William S. Orr and Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Salley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Gramling v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Bank of Lansing v. Stein, Hinkle, Dawe & Associates Architects, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Rush v. WyethDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API