Legal Opinion

In re Tardo

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 11, 1992No. Bankruptcy Appeal No. 92-869Published

1Opinion of the Court

WICKER, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Court which found appellant Joseph Bernstein [“Bernstein”] in contempt and which had ordered him to pay one *863thousand dollars ($1000) in legal fees and costs to the debtor, David Tardo [“Tardo”], d/b/a/ City of New Orleans for Visitors.

This bankruptcy appeal was submitted on briefs without oral argument on a former date.

After considering the briefs of counsel, the record and the applicable law, the Court now AFFIRMS the Bankruptcy Court.

The facts leading up to this appeal are the following:

Bernstein, as counsel for Dixie…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Multiponics, Incorporated, Bankrupt. MacHinery Rental, Inc. And Carl Biehl v. William W. Herpel, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re Computer Communications, Inc., Debtor. Computer Communications, Inc. v. Codex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. In the Matter of Rex L. Hammons, Bankrupts. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Fedders Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. In Re LileUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1989
  5. Cain v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API