City of Pontiac v. Axford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
(Minority Opinion.) Axford was sued by the city of Pontiac to recover taxes assessed against hint on personal property. His defence was chiefly based on the-invalidity of the tax. The objection chiefly urged was that the common council of Pontiac do not appear from the x-eeord of their doings to have passed any of the x*esolutions ¡xecessaxy to male the tax valid in the manner pointed out by the charter, which requix*es that “ the votes of all thexnexnbers of the coxximon council in relation to any act, px'oeeediixg or propositioxx had at any xneeting shall be entered at large in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Steckert v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. Levy Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Town of Madison, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Farr v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Town of Madison, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998