Legal Opinion

Neagle v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 18, 1966No. 65 C 394(3)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REGAN, District Judge.

Before us are motions for summary judgment filed by each of the parties. The action is primarily one to determine and quiet title, in conjunction with which plaintiff also seeks ejectment and damages. The motions are directed to the quiet title count. We have jurisdiction because of the diversity of citizenship and the amount alleged by plaintiff to be in controversy. For reasons hereafter set out, we sustain defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment and deny plaintiff’s motion.

The properties involved are two farms in Texas County,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Housman v. LewellenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Burnet v. BurnetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Cox v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corinne Anne Staigg Neagle v. Ruth Dalton Johnson, Harvey Bailie and Lizzie BailieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API