Legal Opinion

Cheaney v. Hooser

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 1, 1848PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal prom the Christian Circuit. Legislative power. Towns._ Constitutional law. Trespass. Case 73.

1Opinion of the Court

■Chili? Justice Marshall

doliveicd the opinion of the Court — Judge Breck did not sit in this case.

This action of trespass was brought by Cheaney to recover damages for the taking and conversion of his horse by Hooser. The defendant justified as Marshal of the town of Hopkinsville, and avers that he took the horse as a levy or distress, out of which to coerce from the plaintiff a tax of ten dollars, the amount of tax due from him under an assessment of tax for the year 1847, upon the citizens of Hopkinsville, by the Board of Trustees of that town, of which the plaintiff is alleged to have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Winn's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  2. Tesh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Ragland v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Town of Macon v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Mayor of Valverde v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API